See what each model family costs for real tasks — not in abstract tokens, but in dollars per 100 chats or 1,000 coding completions. Find where you already pay for the same model and the cheapest path to the same capability.
Family-first navigation
Real-life price scenarios
Tool overlap visibility
1
Pick a task
What do you need to accomplish?
2
See model families
Matched to your requirements
3
Find cheapest path
API, subscription, or BYOK
Use case:
Budget:
Showing 70 model families. Browse by job-to-be-done, not by confusing model slugs.
Brand, agency, and in-house creative work where commercial safety is a hard requirement. · Designers who already live in Photoshop or Illustrator and want AI generation inside existing workflows.
Claude Haiku 4.5 is best when you want fast, capable work across chat, documents, and tools without paying premium model prices.
fastvisiontool usestructured outputlong context
Best for:
High-volume chat and support flows where speed matters as much as answer quality. · Reading long documents, extracting structure, and answering follow-up questions in one pass.
100 short chats: $0.20 · 1,000 coding completions: $2.20
Claude Opus 4.5 is best when your work needs careful reasoning across code, documents, images, and multi-step tool use.
reasoningcodingvisiontoolsstructured output
Best for:
Working through messy engineering problems that need reasoning, code, and multiple tool calls. · Reading long PDFs or large context dumps and answering follow-up questions without losing the thread.
100 short chats: $1.00 · 1,000 coding completions: $11.00
Claude Opus 4.6 is best when you need one model to handle coding, long documents, and multi-step work reliably.
codinglong contextvisiontoolsstructured output
Best for:
Reading large documents and keeping track of details across very long contexts. · Coding tasks where you want one model to stay useful across bigger workflows, not just single snippets.
100 short chats: $1.00 · 1,000 coding completions: $11.00
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is best for coding, long-document analysis, and agent-style workflows that need reliable tool use.
codinglong-contextvisiontoolsstructured output
Best for:
Writing and fixing production code when you need strong output quality more than the absolute lowest token cost. · Reading huge PDFs, specs, or codebases and then answering detailed follow-up questions in one session.
100 short chats: $0.60 · 1,000 coding completions: $6.60
Claude Sonnet 4.6 is best when you need one model for coding, long documents, tool use, and structured professional work.
codinglong-contextvisiontoolsstructured-output
Best for:
Working through large codebases and iterative development without constantly shrinking context. · Reading long PDFs, reports, or mixed text-and-image materials and then answering precise follow-up questions.
100 short chats: $0.60 · 1,000 coding completions: $6.60
Cohere: Command A is best when you need one model to handle long documents, structured outputs, and agent-style workflows at sane cost.
long contextstructured outputagent workflowscodingmultilingual
Best for:
Reading large documents and then answering detailed follow-up questions in one pass. · Agent workflows that need structured output and reliable multi-step task handling.
100 short chats: $0.42 · 1,000 coding completions: $4.50
Reading long documents and answering follow-up questions without constant chunking pain. · Agent-style workflows that depend on tool use and predictable structured responses.
100 short chats: $0.42 · 1,000 coding completions: $4.50
DeepSeek: R1 is best when you need serious reasoning and tool use without paying top-tier inference prices.
reasoningtoolsopen weightsmoderate costcoding
Best for:
Working through multi-step reasoning tasks where you want the model to show its thinking more openly. · Building agent workflows that need tool use without turning every run into an expensive experiment.
100 short chats: $0.11 · 1,000 coding completions: $1.14
Cheap reasoning tasks where you need solid answers at scale without watching every token. · Structured output jobs like extraction, classification, and JSON-shaped responses.
100 short chats: $0.06 · 1,000 coding completions: $0.46
Devin is an autonomous AI software engineer that plans, codes, debugs, and deploys features with its own tools and workspace.
autonomous codingfeature planningdebuggingdeploymentbrowser use
Best for:
Teams that want an autonomous agent to take a feature from plan to deployment. · Developers who need one tool to reason, code, debug, and use a browser and shell.
Creating polished voiceovers for videos, ads, and explainers that need human-like delivery. · Producing audiobooks or podcast narration where emotion and pacing matter more than raw output volume.
Google: Gemini 2.5 Flash is best for high-volume reasoning, coding, and document work when you need speed without premium-level cost.
reasoninglong contextvisiontoolsstructured output
Best for:
Reading long PDFs, codebases, or research material and then answering focused follow-up questions. · Running tool-using agents that need reasoning across many steps without blowing up cost.
100 short chats: $0.09 · 1,000 coding completions: $1.06
Google: Gemini 2.5 Pro is best when you need one model to read a lot, reason carefully, and produce usable answers.
reasoninglong contextvisiontoolsstructured output
Best for:
Reading large PDFs, specs, or research dumps and then answering detailed follow-up questions. · Technical work where reasoning matters more than speed, especially coding, math, and structured problem-solving.
100 short chats: $0.36 · 1,000 coding completions: $4.25
Best when you need one model to read huge files, reason carefully, and keep multi-step work moving without getting expensive fast.
reasoninglong contextvisiontoolsstructured output
Best for:
Reading large PDFs, specs, and research packs in one pass before you ask follow-up questions. · Coding tasks where you want stronger reasoning and fewer brittle steps across longer sessions.
100 short chats: $0.46 · 1,000 coding completions: $5.20
Google: Gemini 3 Flash Preview is best for fast, tool-using work that needs solid reasoning without paying top-tier model rates.
reasoningvisiontoolsstructured outputlong context
Best for:
Multi-step agent workflows that need tool use, structured output, and quick responses. · Long document Q&A where you want to load a huge file once and keep asking follow-ups.
100 short chats: $0.11 · 1,000 coding completions: $1.30
Google: Gemma 3 27B is best when you want capable vision, reasoning, and long-context work without paying premium model prices.
cheapvisionreasoningstructured output128K context
Best for:
Reading long documents, pulling out answers, and keeping costs near zero. · Vision-language tasks where you want image understanding without moving to a pricier model tier.
100 short chats: $0.01 · 1,000 coding completions: $0.08
A cheap, capable general-purpose model for long documents, tool use, and structured outputs without making every workflow expensive.
cheaplong contextvisiontool usestructured output
Best for:
Reading long PDFs, docs, or transcripts and answering follow-up questions cheaply. · Powering agent or tool-calling workflows where cost can spiral if you pick the wrong model.
100 short chats: $0.02 · 1,000 coding completions: $0.19
A cheap multimodal workhorse for long documents, coding help, and tool-driven tasks when you want low cost without giving up useful reasoning.
cheapvisiontoolsstructured outputreasoning
Best for:
Reading long PDFs or mixed text-image inputs and answering follow-up questions cheaply. · Running tool-based agents that need structured output without burning your budget.
100 short chats: $0.02 · 1,000 coding completions: $0.19
GPT-4.1 is best when you need one model for coding, long documents, and precise instruction-following without paying premium-tier rates.
reasoningvisiontoolsstructured outputlong context
Best for:
Working through large documents, specs, or transcripts while keeping the whole thread in view. · Software engineering tasks where instruction-following and reliable code edits matter more than flashy chat style.
100 short chats: $0.34 · 1,000 coding completions: $3.60
GPT-4.1 Mini is for cheap, high-volume work where you still need long context, vision, and reliable tool calling.
long contextvisiontool callingstructured outputcoding
Best for:
Processing long PDFs or large knowledge packs without constantly chunking and reloading context. · Running coding, extraction, or support workflows at scale when latency and API cost both matter.
100 short chats: $0.07 · 1,000 coding completions: $0.72
GPT-4o-mini is best when you want useful chat, document work, and lightweight automation at very low API cost.
cheapvisiontoolsstructured outputlong context
Best for:
High-volume chat features where you need solid answers without premium-model pricing. · Reading a long PDF, answering follow-up questions, and extracting structured data cheaply.
100 short chats: $0.03 · 1,000 coding completions: $0.27
GPT-5.4 is best when you want one model that can read huge files, use tools, and handle serious coding and knowledge work.
long-contextcodingvisiontool-usestructured-output
Best for:
Reading very large documents and then answering detailed follow-up questions without forcing you to split files manually. · Coding workflows where you want one model for planning, writing, and iterating instead of juggling separate chat and code assistants.
100 short chats: $0.57 · 1,000 coding completions: $6.50
GPT-5.4 Mini is best when you need fast, capable work across coding, documents, and tool-driven workflows without paying top-tier rates.
reasoningvisiontoolsstructured outputlong context
Best for:
High-volume coding and assistant workflows where speed matters as much as answer quality. · Reading long documents and answering follow-up questions without splitting files into chunks.
100 short chats: $0.17 · 1,000 coding completions: $1.95
Extracting structured data from documents, emails, and other messy business text. · Coding tasks where you need usable completions at a predictable per-task cost.
100 short chats: $0.60 · 1,000 coding completions: $6.60
xAI: Grok 3 Mini is best for cheap logic-heavy tasks, tool use, and structured outputs when you need speed over deep expertise.
cheapreasoningtoolsstructured outputfast
Best for:
Running high-volume agent or tool workflows where cost matters more than expert-level depth. · Producing structured outputs for extraction, routing, tagging, and other logic-driven back-office tasks.
100 short chats: $0.03 · 1,000 coding completions: $0.26
HeyGen helps you make avatar-led marketing and training videos fast, then translate them into 40+ languages from one workflow.
AI avatarsvideo generationinstant translation40+ languagesmarketing videos
Best for:
Creating repeatable marketing videos with AI avatars instead of filming presenters. · Translating the same training or onboarding video into 40+ languages quickly.
Ideogram is an AI image generator built for images that need readable text and now delivers strong photorealistic results too.
AI image generationtext-in-imagephotorealismposter mockupsad creatives
Best for:
Making posters, ads, and social graphics where the text inside the image must be readable. · Creating packaging, signage, or branded mockups that mix typography with generated visuals.
Kaiber turns images and audio into stylized AI videos, with a clear focus on music videos and artistic animation.
AI videoaudio-reactivestyle transfermusic videosartistic animation
Best for:
Making audio-reactive music videos from a song and a few visual starting points. · Turning still images into stylized animated clips for artist promos or visual experiments.
Creative exploration where you want images to evolve as you type or sketch. · Fast visual iteration when batch prompting feels too slow and disconnected.
Leonardo AI helps you generate game assets, concept art, and design images with stronger style control and character consistency than generic image tools.
Creating game assets that need to feel like they belong in the same world. · Producing concept art with tighter style control across multiple iterations.
A cheap multimodal workhorse for long documents, tool-driven tasks, and high-volume chat or coding workloads.
cheapvisiontoolsstructured outputlong context
Best for:
Reading large PDFs or knowledge bases and then asking follow-up questions across the full context. · Running agent-style workflows that call tools and return structured output without making every step feel expensive.
100 short chats: $0.03 · 1,000 coding completions: $0.27
Meta: Llama 4 Scout is best when you need cheap long-context analysis, basic multimodal work, and tool-driven tasks without spending much.
cheaplong contextvisiontool usestructured output
Best for:
Reading long PDFs, docs, or logs when you want context headroom without watching token costs. · Low-cost agent workflows that need tool use and structured outputs more than premium writing quality.
100 short chats: $0.01 · 1,000 coding completions: $0.14
Lovable turns plain-English prompts into deployed full-stack web apps, covering frontend, backend, database, and shipping.
AI app builderfull-stack codingfrontend + backenddatabase setupdeployment
Best for:
You want to prototype and ship a full-stack web app from a natural-language brief. · You need one tool to handle frontend, backend, database, and deployment together.
Magnific AI upscales low-resolution images and invents realistic detail that basic enlargement tools simply cannot recover.
AI upscalingimage enhancementdetail generationlow-res recoveryrealistic textures
Best for:
Photographers and designers who need low-res images enlarged with believable texture and sharpness. · Artists and creatives who want AI-added detail instead of plain interpolation during upscale.
Building agents that call tools and return predictable structured output. · Reading long documents and asking follow-up questions without cost anxiety.
100 short chats: $0.28 · 1,000 coding completions: $2.80
Working through technical problems that mix reasoning, code, and precise instruction-following. · Reading long PDFs or dense documentation and then answering specific follow-up questions.
100 short chats: $0.34 · 1,000 coding completions: $3.60
OpenAI: o3 Mini is best when you need careful STEM reasoning without paying premium-model prices.
reasoningcodingmathlong-contexttools
Best for:
Working through code, math, and technical analysis where step-by-step reasoning matters. · Running structured tool workflows that need predictable outputs at low per-task cost.
100 short chats: $0.19 · 1,000 coding completions: $1.98
OpenAI: o4 Mini is for fast, affordable reasoning work that still handles long documents, tools, and images well.
reasoningvisiontoolsstructured outputlong context
Best for:
Reading long PDFs, pulling out answers, and keeping the full document in play. · Running tool-using agents where cost can spiral if the model is too expensive per step.
100 short chats: $0.19 · 1,000 coding completions: $1.98
You sell online and need fast, repeatable product images from ordinary photos. · You process lots of SKU photos and want batch-friendly cleanup over manual retouching.
A cheap, high-context model for document-heavy work, image understanding, and tool-driven automation without blowing up your API bill.
cheaplong contextvisiontoolsstructured output
Best for:
Reading long PDFs, reports, or knowledge bases and then answering follow-up questions cheaply. · Vision tasks where you want one model to look at images and return structured results for downstream tools.
100 short chats: $0.06 · 1,000 coding completions: $0.68
Analyzing long documents and asking follow-up questions without constantly trimming context. · Running multi-step tool or agent workflows where reasoning quality matters more than raw speed.
100 short chats: $0.16 · 1,000 coding completions: $1.72
Creating vector graphics and icons that need consistent style across a brand system. · Generating design assets for teams that care more about control than visual randomness.
Replit Agent is Replit’s coding agent for building, running, and deploying apps inside the Replit IDE.
AI codingApp deploymentReasoningCodebase-awareIDE integration
Best for:
Building and deploying small apps without stitching together separate coding and hosting tools. · Working inside the Replit IDE when you want the agent to understand and act on your codebase.
Perplexity: Sonar Pro is best when you need research-heavy answers, long-document analysis, and multi-step reasoning without high per-task costs.
researchreasoningvisionlong contextdocument Q&A
Best for:
Research workflows where you want multi-step answers instead of quick one-shot replies. · Asking questions over long PDFs, reports, or dense internal documents.
100 short chats: $0.60 · 1,000 coding completions: $6.60
Synthesia turns text scripts into talking-head avatar videos for training, internal communication, and marketing without filming people.
AI avatarstext-to-videotext-to-speechmultilingualcustom avatars
Best for:
Making corporate training videos that need a consistent presenter every time. · Turning internal updates or announcements into polished multilingual avatar videos quickly.